Recent nutritional research has found that most people do not consume sufficient Vitamin A on a daily basis. This is not good, because Vitamin A is unexpendable to good health. Major health problems can result from long-term Vitamin A deficiencies. Vitamin A is essential from the start of life. Pregnant women must be doomed to ingest sufficient Vitamin A, which will be much than they necessary before pregnancy, because Vitamin A plays a key role in the prissy physical development of a fetus. It helps to sustain proper cell differentiation, which is the specialization of cells upon division to do certain tasks, meaning that cells for the heart take on the heart’s characteristics, those for the colored take on the liver’s, those for the brain take on the brain’s characteristics and functions, and so on. Vitamin A also helps with boney growth and development, as well as in the overall growth and development of the body.
Submitted by root on Tue, 2007-08-21 20:08.
Kim Beardsmore
As a weight loss mentor it never ceases to amaze me how people inadvertently set themselves up for a big snack attack middle afternoon. For many, the ready up is so complete that it is almost insurmountable to control! The result is that people think they are weak-willed and lacking in discipline. Often the answer has little to do with character or determination. More often the reason for the mid afternoon carbohydrate cravings is due to gaps in understanding how our body works and responds to diferent types of food. Read on to see what you can do to control those middle afternoon cravings.
Trigger foods
If you want to control those cravings there are a few principles you must be evocative of. The first is concerning trigger foods. Nutritional research has documented, carbohydrates trigger the brain to crave more carbohydrates, major to a cycle of carbohydrate eating that becomes woody to control. Trigger foods keep you fat. The goal is to have control over these foods rather than allowing them to have control over you.
What do trigger foods look like? Well, they vary from person to person, but typically look like downy drinks, potato chips, corn chips, peanuts, french fries, cheese, pizza, chocolate chip cookies, pretzel, apple pie, candy bar and so on. These are the foods that for many, "once we pop, we can't stop!".
Isn't it amazing that complete these types of foods are acquirable from take-away places? They are so readily acquirable and have crept into our regular routine without us even planning it to happen. We get hungry, we are busy, we are distracted, and one serve leads to another; and we don't realise just how much we are eating as the triggering effect takes place in our brains. By eating a miniscule portion of some of the preceding you can easily consume anywhere from 350 to cardinal calories. Two serves could be 700 to 2000 calories! Most women on a weight loss program are aiming for between 1200-1400 calories a day, so you can see that cardinal snack can seriously sabotage your plans. Does this sound like you? I can hear the wakeless sighs of regret and frustration! Don't worry, there are answers for you.
You can be empowered to take control when you know how to avoid the nutritional set up that will drive you towards trigger foods.
Here are a few uncomplicated principles that will deal a harmful blow to the late afternoon "snack monster".
Five steps to avoid carbohydrate cravings:
1. Incorporate protein in to your breakfast AND lunch. Protein is key to dominant carbohydrate cravings. The RDA of protein for women is 60 grams a day. For women wanting to lose weight, health professionals recommend approximately 100 grams of protein daily. Why? cardinal of the principle advantages of protein is that it creates a feeling of fullness and satisfaction in the body that makes overeating much little likely. Source your protein from ultra lean sources so you don't pick up unloved calories and supersaturated fats.
Even better, than providing a sense of sustained fullness, protein can block the triggering effect that carbohydrates can have on the brain. If you eat protein with a carbohydrate it will reduce the cravings caused by eating the carbohydrate.
2. Never skip meals. Research has shown that people who skip meals are more unerect to obesity than those who regularly eat 3 meals a day. In fact, people who space their daily food requirements by making suitable use of well-preserved snacks do equal better. Why is this? When you skip meals you are more likely to get hungry and fill up on easily obtained swift foods which are often trigger foods.
3. Drink 6 to 8 glasses of water throughout the day. For whatsoever people sugar full soft drinks are a trigger food. Make doomed you don't get thirsty in the first place. Water creates a sense of fullness and has a host of opposite health benefits.
4. Plan the timing of your meals so that you don't get hungry. Despite having three healthy meals a day, sometimes your work schedule can mean the spacing of those meals still does not guard against the carbohydrate cravings. If you have a daylong gap between meals, make sure you carry healthy snacks to cover the distance, otherwise hunger will set in
5. Plan your snacks. Plan out your weekly snack schedule with some delicious, healthy snacks. Purchase these with your weekly shopping so that you are fully prepared. If you need to, get up a hardly a minutes earlier in the morning so you have time to prepare and take your snacks to work. Remember, well-preserved snacks don't liveborn in a vending machine! You are little likely to get hungry when you have a ripe supply of well-preserved snacks.
6. Carry emergency supplies of nutritional protein bars in your handbag or short case. When you feel a carbohydrate craving, eat the protein bar instead and wait 30 minutes before acting on the craving. much often than not the craving will pass and you will be in control again. This truly works!
Incorporate these principles into your regular routine and you could be healed underway to change your life and be able to take control finished the mid afternoon 'snack attacks'.
About The Author
Submitted by root on Thu, 2006-09-21 13:38.
Kim Beardsmore
As a weight loss mentor it never ceases to amaze me how people inadvertently set themselves up for a huge snack attack mid afternoon. For many, the ready up is so complete that it is almost insurmountable to control! The result is that people think they are weak-willed and lacking in discipline. Often the answer has little to do with character or determination. much often the reason for the middle afternoon carbohydrate cravings is due to gaps in perceptive how our body works and responds to diferent types of food. Read on to see what you can do to control those mid afternoon cravings.
Trigger foods
If you want to control those cravings there are a few principles you must be aware of. The first is concerning trigger foods. Nutritional research has documented, carbohydrates trigger the brain to crave more carbohydrates, major to a cycle of carbohydrate eating that becomes woody to control. Trigger foods keep you fat. The goal is to have control over these foods rather than allowing them to have control finished you.
What do trigger foods look like? Well, they vary from person to person, but typically look same soft drinks, potato chips, corn chips, peanuts, french fries, cheese, pizza, chocolate chip cookies, pretzel, apple pie, candy bar and so on. These are the foods that for many, "once we pop, we can't stop!".
Isn't it surprising that all these types of foods are available from take-away places? They are so readily available and have crept into our daily routine without us even planning it to happen. We get hungry, we are busy, we are distracted, and one serve leads to another; and we don't realise just how much we are eating as the triggering effect takes place in our brains. By eating a small portion of any of the above you can easily consume anywhere from 350 to 1000 calories. Two serves could be 700 to 2000 calories! Most women on a weight loss program are aiming for between 1200-1400 calories a day, so you can see that one snack can seriously sabotage your plans. Does this sound same you? I can hear the wakeless sighs of regret and frustration! Don't worry, there are answers for you.
You can be empowered to take control when you know how to avoid the nutritional set up that will drive you towards trigger foods.
Here are a few uncomplicated principles that will deal a harmful blow to the late afternoon "snack monster".
Five steps to avoid carbohydrate cravings:
1. Incorporate protein in to your breakfast AND lunch. Protein is key to dominant carbohydrate cravings. The RDA of protein for women is 60 grams a day. For women wanting to lose weight, health professionals recommend approximately cardinal grams of protein daily. Why? cardinal of the principle advantages of protein is that it creates a feeling of fullness and satisfaction in the body that makes overeating much little likely. Source your protein from immoderate lean sources so you don't pick up unwanted calories and saturated fats.
Even better, than providing a sense of continuous fullness, protein can block the triggering effect that carbohydrates can have on the brain. If you eat protein with a carbohydrate it will reduce the cravings caused by eating the carbohydrate.
2. Never skip meals. Research has shown that people who skip meals are more unerect to obesity than those who regularly eat 3 meals a day. In fact, people who space their regular food requirements by making appropriate use of healthy snacks do even better. Why is this? When you skip meals you are more likely to get hungry and fill up on easily obtained swift foods which are often trigger foods.
3. Drink 6 to 8 glasses of water throughout the day. For whatsoever people sugar full soft drinks are a trigger food. Make sure you don't get absorptive in the archetypical place. Water creates a sense of fullness and has a host of other health benefits.
4. Plan the timing of your meals so that you don't get hungry. Despite having cardinal healthy meals a day, sometimes your work schedule can mean the spacing of those meals still does not guard against the carbohydrate cravings. If you have a long gap between meals, make doomed you carry well-preserved snacks to cover the distance, other hunger will ready in
5. Plan your snacks. Plan down your weekly snack schedule with whatsoever delicious, healthy snacks. Purchase these with your weekly shopping so that you are fully prepared. If you need to, get up a few minutes earlier in the morning so you have time to prepare and take your snacks to work. Remember, well-preserved snacks don't liveborn in a vending machine! You are less likely to get hungry when you have a ready supply of healthy snacks.
6. Carry emergency supplies of nutritional protein bars in your handbag or brief case. When you feel a carbohydrate craving, eat the protein bar instead and wait 30 minutes before acting on the craving. much often than not the craving will pass and you will be in control again. This truly works!
Incorporate these principles into your regular routine and you could be healed underway to change your life and be able to take control finished the mid afternoon 'snack attacks'.
© Copyright Kim Beardsmore
About The Author
Submitted by root on Thu, 2006-09-14 05:38.
Protica Nutritional Research
While America has given birth to the song “Young at Heart”, and the phrase “you’re as young as you feel!” can be heard from coast to coast by millions of people, demographic trend point firmly toward the other direction: aging.
Currently, the 65+ population comprises slightly much than 12% (35 million) of the total US population. By 2030, this percentage is expected to almost large to just below 20% (71 million)[i]. In other words, within a generation, an unprecedented demographic reality will exist in the US: 1 in 5 Americans will be older than 65.
This is indeed news worthy celebrating, because it means that much Americans are live longer, healthier lives than ever before. Yet this trend also presents whatsoever very real health-related problems that American society must solve.
Various sectors are frenetically trying to position themselves to deal with this aging demographic inevitability. The dental care field is loudly lobbying to increase awareness and resource-support for age-related ailments such as imperfect denture and ablated saliva-flow conditions[ii]. At the same time, the allied health care field is similarly trying – and admittedly troubled -- to develop the immense resources, such as galore more doctors and nurses, who will somehow absorb the imminent and irresistible old age-related demand for surgical procedures and other health care commodities[iii].
Yet while the dental and health sectors strive to adjust to this demographic trend, the nutritional sector has not kept pace. A quick look at any health food store shelf will see energy bars and powders that are (according to their marketing images) suitable single for high-performance (e.g. young) consumers. Similarly, the nutrition sector has not finished a good job at destroying the myth that macronutrients such as protein are essential parts of all well-preserved diets – heedless of age.
The nutrition sector’s general neglect of the senior community is something that is just barely beginning to show as the population ages, and as the “baby boomer” generation of 76 million strong moves towards retirement[iv]. However, it is fatal that this service gap will become larger as the future unfolds. Essentially, tens of millions of seniors are going to need to find spic-and-span and innovative nutrition solutions possibly for the first time in their lives.
The prospects that face a 65-year-old searching for a nutrition solution are in some ways much the unvarying as those facing a 25-year-old: there are an array of promised solutions on the market, including energy bars, drinks, and supplements.
However, this is where the similarities between the average 65-year-old and 25-year-old end because while the last mentioned may be competent to get absent with experimenting, the former cannot. In other words, a 25-year-old consumer may add energy bars to their eating regimen and realize in a hardly a months that they’re really eating glorified, calorie-rich candy bars. A 65-year-old consumer does not have that same luxury to try, and possibly err, when it comes to making nutritional choices. His or her choices must be wise and in dispute from the start, particularly since old people tend to suffer from decreased appetite, and often have poorer access to balanced nutrition than their junior counterparts.
This is a grave problem that the nutritional sector essential accept and take ownership of. This means that much than simple awareness is needed actualised tangible solutions are required. The basal fact is that senior citizens – like all opposite age groups – require balanced nutrition, and for galore of them, the best and most convenient way to access it is through nutritional supplements.
This much-delayed awareness does seem, however, to be abating. There are currently innovative companies that are creating nutritional supplements fit for all ages, regardless of physiological activity. This suitability is the result of a carefully balanced protein blend that captures complete essential amino acids. Since many seniors continue to lose nitrogen and thus protein as they age, it is incredibly important that seniors access ways to compensate for this gradual loss.
These low-calorie, carbohydrate-free, fat-free nutritional supplements also help seniors avoid adding unwanted body greasy that would weaken muscle mass and destabilize body strength and energy levels. Furthermore, the perfect product would be available in semiliquid form, allowing seniors with dentures or other tooth concerns to easily ingest a serving without anxiety.
The fact that America’s population is old is just that: a fact. It is not an opinion, an enlightened guess, or a possible expectation. It will happen, and it is unexpendable that America’s seniors be provided with the solutions that they need in order to continue living full, joyful lives. The dental and health care fields are already hard at work positioning themselves, as best that they can right now, to absorb this unprecedented demographic change. Thanks to a very small – but hopefully increasing number – of senior-friendly supplements, there is finally a reason to add the nutrition field to this list as well.
References
[i] Source: “Public Health an Aging: Trends in Aging – cohesive States and Worldwide”. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 13:08.
Protica Nutritional Research
America’s focus on nutritious eating began to receive general attention in the 1940s when President Roosevelt introduced the RDA, or advisable Daily Allowance (RDA) model. This model, which took on the shape of a pyramid in the 1980s (and hence now goes by the term “food pyramid”), has gone through a number of iterations since its inception more than 60 years ago[i].
This change and evolution of the RDA model is, in many respects, a positive step. It demonstrates that, just as America’s information on diet and nutrition is advancing, so too are the models that guide its eating habits. In fact, the USDA itself has definite to update the term and now refers to “RDI’s” (“Reference Daily Intake”) instead of RDA’s.
However, undermining whatsoever of this constructive change is the fact that galore Americans are increasingly confused over what, how, and when to eat. A survey conducted by the USDA in 1996 verified this fact when 40% of respondents united strongly with the statement that “there are so galore recommendations about well-preserved ways to eat, it’s hard to know what to believe”[ii].
One of the most grave expressions of this growing dietary confusion has to do with a concept called the regular Value, or “DV”. Introduced by the USDA in the 1990s, the DV is a dietary numerical reference that is supposed to allow people to make healthy eating choices[iii].
The unemotional idea behind the DV, which is expressed as a percentage, is that it provides a very important piece of information. The DV informs consumers how much of a nutrient they are getting from a particular food item. For example, if the DV label on a can of beans declares that it represents “10% of the DV for fat”, then consumers can keep track of that number to know if, throughout the day, how much greasy they are eating
1.
However, cardinal does not have to be a mathematician or a dietician to see that the preceding idea begs a significant question: is this10% of the DV for greasy “good” or is it “bad”? In other words, should a consumer choose this source of fat because it represents a good source of fat, or avoid it for the different reason?
It is this question that has caused so much confusion among health-conscious consumers. It has caused specific anxiety among those who are wisely ensuring that they eat the advisable daily allowance for protein.
The importance of protein in diet cannot be understated. It is not simply an essential macronutrient for athletes, such as bodybuilders and runners. Protein is important for life itself, regardless of mobility or athleticism. Among other essential functions, protein maintains and repairs muscle tissue, aids digestion, regulates chemicals, manages hormones, and produces enzymes[iv]. In extreme cases, a dangerous lack of protein actually leads to a condition called Kwashiorkor, where the body cannibalizes itself
2.
Trying to determine the right amount of protein – as expressed in terms of DV% -- has been a difficult challenge for most eaters. Unfortunately, as a result of this confusion, some consumers have not been eating high quality protein. This is because the DV number is simply not enough information upon which they can make healthy protein eating decisions.
The missing number in the DV equation is the Reference Daily Intake (RDI) level. The RDI for protein is, generally, 50 grams per day. Consumers can take the number of total grams of protein in a product, and divide it by this RDI for protein to determine what the “optimum” DV number should be.
For example, if a product offers 25 grams of protein, and the RDI is 50 grams per day, then the product’s “optimum” DV will be 50%. Therefore, the figure “50%” should appear on the product’s labeling. If the number is lower than 50%, the consumers instantly know that it is not an optimum source of protein.
Finding high superior sources for unexpendable micronutrients like protein (among others) is a challenge that should not be difficult, but it is, because whatsoever food makers do not want to educate consumers on how to detect high quality from low quality. This is particularly hapless in the health and nutrition food industry, where cardinal would expect manufacturers strive for higher quality nutrition. Regrettably, this is not always the case.
However, that is not reason to despair. Rather, it just as untold reason to support companies that are making the effort to ensure that their products reflect only high superior DV levels, and a concurrent effort to educate the public on how to determine best DV.
[1] The FDA is broad that the DV concept is not intended to matrilineal people on how much they should eat. In this example, the eater should not conclude that eating 10 cans of beans will achieve “100% of the advisable fat intake per day”. The DV is intended as a reference number only and not as a recommendation. The intake per day is advisable by the RDA/RDI, which will be discussed further in this article.
[2] Kwashiorkor is much prevalent in whatsoever parts of the developing world, but incidences have been reported in the US.
References
[i] Source: “Food Pyramid History”.
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 12:38.
Protica Nutritional Research
The importance of protein in diet has been clearly established by nutritional scientists, and widely accepted by athletes. Among other indispensable functions, protein is indispensable for creating muscle. Just as important is protein’s essential ability to repair damaged muscles after training[i].
While the value of protein in diet has been accepted and promoted within the active community, it has been less healed disseminated within the very large sedentary population. Currently making up about 25% of Americans[ii] – or 1 in every 4 people – sedentary people are defined as those who undertake less than fractional an hour of moderate physical activity per day[iii].
A key problem to solve, therefore, is that the bulk of these sedentary Americans do not know that they are, or more likely are not, getting sufficient protein in their diet. This life-sized group of sedentary people reflects the myth that protein-rich nutrition is influential only for athletes and those who are physically active. The Reference regular Intake
1 amount for protein is 50 grams, and most sedentary people are not coming intimate to meeting this standard.
Next to water, protein is the body’s most prevalent substance. Protein is the essential building block for muscle and tissue, and indispensable for the running of critical systems, such as digestion. Protein even helps regulate and control hormones and chemicals that influence mood and coping ability something that has an impact for all people, heedless of physical exercise regimen. In fact, in the context of protein deficiency-related mood disorders, cardinal may argue that a sedentary person on the mordacious road to obesity might be psychologically better equipped to implement a controlled (e.g. healthy) eating plan if, among other key factors, a complete protein diet exited from the start.
Yet there is other related problem that is arguably much damaging. The infinitesimal information that most Sedentary Americans are receiving about protein – snippets of facts here and there, mostly from marketers and advertisers – are often outright misleading. This is most clearly seen in the world of swift food.
Many sedentary Americans who have some basic awareness of protein’s importance in diet believe, due largely to marketing campaigns, that fast food burgers are a “good source of protein”. Lost in this belief is the fact that virtually all fast food burgers are almost thoroughly unhealthy choices that are higher in saturated fat, calories, sodium, cholesterol, and the list goes on.
In fact, a popular burger contains 52% of the recommended daily value (DV) of fat, and over cardinal calories, of which 60% are from fat
2. These clearly unhealthy factors diminish the nutritional value from the burger’s 24 grams of protein.
It is largely repayable to this lack of information – and concurrent existence of misinformation -- that prevents galore sedentary Americans from learning about the importance of protein. At the unvarying time, it is also clear to medical experts that the concept of a sedentary lifestyle is a grave global health problem that must be addressed sooner rather than later[iv].
Addressing this problem is, like many degenerative health conditions, complex and multi-layered. Yet accepting this complexity is, in itself, a starting point for a solution one that essential equally be multi-layered and holistic in approach. Awareness of protein must extend beyond the boundaries of the “fit and athletic” communities, and concurrently, ways for sedentary people to access protein must be formulated ways that are entirely healthier than fast food burgers.
Despite the ambitious and admittedly ascending battle that galore sedentary Americans face today, there is reason to be rationally optimistic. There are products on the market that are providing self-balancing sources of all-out protein, yet in responsible, low-calorie and fat-free portions. Since these products are fortified with vitamins and nutrients, they can be used as either a supplement or a complete meal replacement. This is of notable value for dieters and “time starved” individuals who are seeking quick, convenient ways to eat healthy.
Ultimately, resolving this problem of sedentary Americans will not be easy, nor will it be rapid. It has taken generations to create the statistic that 1 in 4 Americans lead sedentary lifestyles and it may take generations to unravel this knot. The hallmarks of unraveling it, however, are clear: quality awareness, quality understanding, and above all, superior nutritional products that consumers both demand, and indeed, thoroughly deserve from their food manufacturers.
[1] Formerly referred by its known name “Recommended regular Allowance”.
[2] The USDA’s recommendation is 30% calories from fat
References
[i] Source: “The Power of Protein”. The Physician and Sportsmedicine.
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 12:08.
Protica Nutritional Research
Images of “protein powder” containers with accomplished bodybuilders on their labels help inform consumers that protein is a critical macronutrient in strength training success. Yet what is sometimes lost in this protein-bodybuilding link is that protein is an unexpendable component for everyone, regardless of physiological activity. Even those who live sedentary lives must ensure that their protein intake is all-out and balanced.
The importance of protein in diet is undeniable. Protein creates digestive enzymes, transports other vitamins and nutrients, builds and repairs body tissue, and helps keep harmful bacteria at bay[i]. These are bodily system function that all people need – not just bodybuilders and other athletes.
Eating the appropriate composition of protein in meals is, however, proving to be an unusually ambitious challenge for galore Americans. To begin with, many protein sources are not considered “complete” because they do not provide all of the required amino acids necessary in order to build newer proteins. These incomplete proteins are often derived from fruit, grain, vegetable, and nut sources[ii]. However, the secondary to these partial protein sources – such as meats and dairy – present their personal unique dietary challenges.
The first challenge with respect to these meat-based sources of complete protein is that they are not an option for vegetarians. While the number of US vegetarians is difficult to pinpoint, educated estimates suggest that there are about 6 million adult vegetarians in the US, and the number is growing annually[iii]. Therefore, 6 cardinal adult Americans cannot access complete protein through meat sources.
The second challenge is that galore meat- and dairy-based meals in the US are excessively high in supersaturated fat, calories, sodium, and other enlarged elements. As such, while those who frequent fast food restaurants for their source of all-out protein may not suffer from protein deficiency, a displeasing number of these people will suffer from poor health. This includes: obesity, clogged arteries, higher blood pressure, and other adverse consequences what medical experts call the “social irresponsibility” of the fast food industry[iv].
The clear challenge for nutritional experts is to identify a protein source that is some healthy and complete. The consequences of not finding a suitable protein source range from underperforming digestive systems and chemical imbalances to the ill effects of a condition called “Kwashiorkor”. much frequent in nonindustrial countries but with reported incidinces in the US, Kwashiorkor occurs in intense protein-deficiency situations when when the body cannibalizes itself in a desperate attempt to find a source of protein.
Several attempts have been ready-made to find the ideal complete protein source: one that is healthy, get-at-able to all eaters, and convenient. Indeed, this last criterion of convenience is of particular importance, because many Americans in the ordinal century evidently have less time to eat than ever before.
Some of these attempts to find the ideal complete protein source hearken rearmost a few generations. The classic minor butter and jelly sandwich has been adopted as a complete protein source by some, but rejected by galore more. While minor butter does provide a good source of protein, the sodium content of most grocery store peanut butter brands, and the higher carbohydrate and greasy levels of the average “PB&J on white” keep it from being an ideal choice[v].
Other proposed solutions are more recent inventions. These include the range of nutritional powders and “energy” bars available in most health food stores, and in a growing number of grocery stores. With respect to protein powders, while some of them do provide a decent source of protein, it is simply not a convenient source for most people. With respect to energy bars, many of them have been criticized for their high calorie and carbohydrate levels.
Another solution – and one that is garnering some grave acclaim from within the health community – is disposable nutritional supplements that are easy to transport, and offer a complete protein source suitable for both vegetarians and non-vegetarians alike
1. At the same time, these products are specifically designed to be low-calorie (and therefore diet-friendly), and offer additional nutrients and vitamins that the body needs in addition to complete protein.
These innovative, all-out protein products are a positive communicatory in a nutritional sector that has struggled with misinformation. Regrettably, many questionable energy bars and protein powders are laden with calories and carbohydrates. whatsoever of them – in particular galore energy bars – hardly offer some protein, which is a curious omission that most consumers do not realize as they ingest these products.
Fortunately, as known above, there are scientifically engineered products on the market that deliver the complete protein and nutrition that consumers expect when they purchase something with the words “nutritional supplement” on the container.
[1] These products use “Actinase®” protein, which is derived from isolated animal sources that do not contain the lactose and fat normally associated with animal-based proteins.
References
[i] Source: “The Importance of Protein”. OhioHealth.
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 11:38.
Protica Nutritional Research
An American culture that is noticeable by a degenerative lack of time and the need to achieve is often in pursuit of the “best” something or other. These “best” lists tend to improve time efficiency they help people make quick decisions without a lot of research or “trial and error”.
However, as with most inventions, there is a potentially harmful application of these very best-selling “best” lists. There are situations where the need to identify the primo of something obscures the real truth that, quite simply, there is no single best ranking. In other words, the best of something is in reality a combination of many things. Within the international of nutrition, there arguably is not a more broad – and mordacious – expression of this truth past in looking at protein.
The international of nutrition is not short on “best” opinions for sources of protein. Some camps lobby in favor of whey protein as the best, while others advocate soy. Some claim that meat and poultry are the primo source of protein, while others swear that a plant-based item such as spirulina ranks at the top. There are so galore opinions – all one claiming to support the primo source of protein – that consumers are often left-handed less informed aft reading a hardly a of them, rather than more educated.
One of the reasons that the search for the best source of protein is so widespread is because of its important importance within a healthy diet. complete bodily functions are aided, directly or indirectly, by protein. In addition to being an unexpendable energy source, protein is a component of every body cell, and among other vital contributions, helps in the creation, maintenance, and repair of muscle tissue[i].
Furthermore, it is widely accepted – heedless of view on the “best” source of protein – that a all-out source of protein is required by all people, heedless of athleticism or mobility. This all-out source of protein must reflect complete 20 different amino acids that comprise protein. Since the body can single create 12 of them through its own synthetic production capacity, 8 amino acids – titled “essential amino acids” -- must be obtained through diet[ii].
This is where the confusion ultimately lies, and the root cause of the current confusion. Various groups claim that definite specific food sources, such as whey, milk protein, or calcium caseinate
1, respectively, is the several best source of protein. Surprisingly, however, a growing body of research is suggesting that that all of these views are incorrect. Rather, a variety of protein sources is proving to be the best.
Unfortunately, accessing this variety of protein sources is a challenge for many consumers. Unless a consumer is very well experienced in nutrition, possibly to the point of being thoughtful an expert, he or she cannot confidently know if the variety of proteins are being eaten in some particular meal.
Furthermore, some sources of protein – such as swift food burgers – may indeed contain a desired amount of essential amino acids, but the excessively high amount of calories, monounsaturated fats, carbohydrates, and other unwanted elements make them a thoroughly unwise eating choice [iii].
The goal – one that has been sought for decades -- is therefore to identify a food source that provides consumers with a healthy, convenient, inexpensive, appetizing, and complete source of protein.
Fortunately, despite prodigious delays in bringing a worthy product to the consumer marketplace – delays due to the scientifically pointless search for the several best source of protein -- there are some progressive nutritional supplements that are achieving this goal. These products offer consumers a complete amino unpleasant profile derived from a combined mix of protein sources. Some of these evolved products – albeit a precise limited number of them -- are even able to meet the opposite consumer criterion: convenience, affordability, palatability, low-calorie, and high nutritional (e.g. vitamin enriched) content.
American health dialogue will continue to be populated with “best” lists, and in many ways, these lists are quite useful timesaving devices. However, there are obvious situations where the relentless pursuit of the “best” of something can actually cause much harm than good when there is, in fact, no “best” of something to speak of. In the international of protein and diet, this is clearly the case: there is no single best source of protein. single a balanced mix of protein sources will achieve the goal of delivering the body’s important protein requirements. Fortunately, more nutrition experts are starting to acknowledge this technological truth, and it is a trend towards intelligent health that is supposed to continue.
[1] Calcium caseinate is created via the acidification of fat-free milk.
References
[i] Source: “Protein in Diet”. DiscoveryHealth.com.
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 11:08.
Protica Nutritional Research
Americans are literally running out of time. Achieving a work-life balance, which is still a luxury for tens of millions of working parents, has been overtaken by an even greater demand: a work-life-nutrition balance. Unfortunately, this increasing demand for nutrition has not been accompanied by a useful strategy that enables people to reclaim time from their troubled lives.
The result of this dilemma has been an additional layer of stress practical on top of an already disagreeable life. This has further highlighted stress as America’s best health problem something that was archetypical brought to in the public eye attention in the early 1980s, and has since much obvious in the 2 decades since then[i].
Once the link between time mismanagement and stress is ready-made – and it is virtually obvious at this point that this link exists[ii] -- a range of unfavorable health and nutrition consequences often result. The vicious cycle that ensues is harrowing and celebrated to most people through direct experience, or via painfully seeing it obvious in the life of a family member, friend, or colleague.
Stress can -- and often does -- lead to unhealthy eating[iii], which in turn, leads to equal more stress because the body is not receiving the essential micronutrients and vitamins that it requires. While this is happening, since poor eating is often associated with undesirable weight gain, another level of psychological stress – this one related with body image problems – is unleashed.
Although if the cycle ended here this would be sufficient to solidify this as a starring problem, it continues beyond this point and becomes worse.
This mental stress due to body image problems/weight gain often leads to “emotional eating”. It is estimated that 75% of all overeating is the result of emotional eating[iv]. This, in turn, leads to yet much nutritional deficiency, since the emotional eating is typically of unhealthy comfort foods that are fruitful in saturated fat. This – as can be inferred -- leads to yet more stress, and the cycle continues, unabated, often resulting in malnutrition, obesity, and in more cases than most average people realize, even suicide.
The almost clinical description of this negative cycle in the previous paragraphs does not remotely capture the indescribable pain and suffering that tens of millions of Americans experience all day due to the collision of stress, lack of time, and bad eating habits. While no description could accurately capture the devastation that this negative loop causes, it is sufficient in the context of this article to firmly declare that it is a profoundly prodigious crisis.
No quick-fix solution to a problem of this magnitude is possible, and some attempt for an overnight solution should be met with the most assertive skepticism. The important to addressing a situation of this immense complexity is to identify the root cause, and then provide remedies that mitigate or in some cases, avoid the unfavourable loop from opening in the archetypical place.
One of the root causes of this problem has been known already: a lack of time. If more Americans had more time, or felt that they had more time, the stress related with not having enough time would not be competent to pull them under and into a negative nutrition spiral. Therefore, a solution that works on this equal – the equal of time – is going to be help solve this problem to some extent.
It is within this awareness that time is of the essence that a number of nutritional supplements have been created. Unfortunately, while many of these supplements take mere seconds to ingest, an array of them are not providing the body’s requirement for micronutrients and vitamins.
Furthermore, and quite irresponsibly, galore so-called “energy bars” are very higher in calories and carbohydrates, and as such can lead to emotional eating and trigger weight gain. It is even more hapless than this to observe that the race to market many nutritional supplement products has been more about making money through artful advertising and slogans, than it has been about helping people save time, eat healthy, and avoid potentially life-altering negative stress cycles. This is proved by the number of so-called nutritional supplements that are little more than expensive and tasteless candy bars.
However, there are whatsoever products that have risen to this ethical challenge – products that have been truly glorious by actual nutritional scientists who see a dire need in society, and have engineered a useful product to help meet that need.
The easiest way to identify such products is to find those that deliver a complete, self-balancing source of nutrition for time-starved individuals, including: adults, kids, athletes, sedentary individuals, and all those in between. At the same time, these elite products should provide a range of unexpendable nutrients so that, in effect, the nutrition source can be relied upon as a all-out meal when time is severely limited.
Solving America’s time-starved dilemma is big than any cardinal product, or series of products, to solve. However, though the perfect solution to this involved problem remains elusive, it is broad that part of that eventual solution will depend on resolving causes, and not chasing symptoms. Nutritional products that offer scientifically formulated meal and supplement solutions will be a major ally in this resolution.
References
[i] Source: “America’s #1 Health Problem”. Stress.org.
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 10:38.
Protica Nutritional Research
Efforts to expand the limits of human strength and endurance have kept the scientist and the athlete in use for centuries. The quest for other pound of muscle, or to lift next couple of kilos has been relentlessly pursued in the gym and the laboratory alike. As the questions and conquests became more challenging, the answers have become more elusive and complicated. Few concepts and conclusions have withstood the test of time in exercise physiology. equal as we tackle the metabolic and genetic basis of skeletal muscle response to strength training, there are single some things that we know for sure.
Strength is the additive expression of the innumerable myofibrils law-abiding arranged to form the muscle. Strength training attempts to boost these protein motors and the biological machinery that supports them. Resistance exercises create a biochemical environment in the body wherein the turnover of proteins is optimized and the protein synthetic machinery is primed for growth. All that is needed to trigger a spurt of growth is a protein rich meal. This response occurs in all age groups, although it is less effective in the elderly. According to Philips SM, Tipton KD and others, in young individuals, the muscle is pervious to protein and amino acids for 48 hours aft a workout. The only limiting factor for the hypertrophy of skeletal muscles during this period is the availability of high superior proteins.
A few tricks can amplify the growth response to strength training. The unreal machinery has a ceiling. It can only handle a certain amount of amino acids at a time (specifically, six grams of protein). However, as the response lasts for two days, Bohe` J., in a dose-response study published in Journal of Physiology, 2003, recommended that continual supplementation with cardinal to six grams of high superior protein during the 48 hours aft a workout can optimize the protein synthetic response without topping out the protein synthetic enzyme systems. Combining protein supplements with satisfactory carbohydrate (35g of sucrose with all 6g of protein) is also helpful. The carbohydrate acts as fuel for the muscle fibers sparing the protein for growth.
Research into the response of undisciplined strength athletes has come up with surprising results. The demand for proteins increases in some the trained and the untrained states. However, the relational protein requirement of an untrained athlete per kg per day often exceeds the trained counterpart. The initial phase of resistance training is exemplified by rapid growth and hypertrophy of lean muscles, before it hits the plateau. Another factor is the relative inefficiency of the protein synthetic machinery in the untrained state. Well-formulated protein supplements are thus needed to sustain equal the early phases of resistance training.
This is not to say that the protein requirements of the trained strength athlete are comparable to the sedentary population. By the time the maintenance phase of resistance training is reached, the lean body collective would have enlarged exponentially. The whole quantity of proteins that are imperfect down and unorthodox during protein turnover in a drilled strength athlete is still many times higher than mean levels. Philips SM, in his review on Protein Requirements in Strength Athletes, states that this requirement may be as high as 1.5 times baseline levels.
The hunt past is for a high quality protein diet that would supply all the essential amino acids required. Considering the various biochemical principles discussed, this protein supplementation should be rapidly absorbable so that amino acids delivery can be accurately timed to the post-workout period. Rapid absorption would also enable seven-fold doses of the protein supplement to be taken during this period. The protein supplement also needs to be in small quantities (3 to 6g) to prevent saturating protein synthesis pathways and to minimize protein waste finished excretion.
Protein supplements that just all of these requirements, such as Profect protein beverage by Protica Research, are used widely across weightlifting communities. The unique constitution of Profect enables it to provide not only complete the essential amino acids, but also the specific amino acids used in muscle fiber synthesis. Profect promotes the synthesis of Glutathione, an antioxidant that neutralizes free radicals. These free radicals, produced during anaerobic workouts like resistance training, injure the cell membranes. brief term insults same muscle sprains to long term effects like aging and cancer have been attributed to liberated radicals. Supplementing the diet with Profect can boost the normal levels of the free immoderate scavenger, Glutathione and help avert liberated radical damage.
Undeniably, protein reigns as the supreme building block for strength training. The difference between you and your next pound of muscle can oftentimes be a measurement of the type of protein formula you use in your diet.
About The Author
Submitted by root on Mon, 2006-09-11 10:08.
Recent comments
3 days 15 hours ago
5 days 37 min ago
5 days 6 hours ago
5 days 6 hours ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
1 week 2 days ago
2 weeks 2 days ago