Jesse Cannone
In the past hardly a years I've seen a huge transition in the fitness industry. More and more people are using functional training, and some argue it's the single way to train. The purpose of this article is to give people an understanding of what functional training is, and what it does and does not do.
First, lets look at what serviceable actually means.
Func.tion.al 1. competent of operating or functioning, 2. competent of serving the purpose for which it was intentional (Webster's Encyclopedia ordinal Edition, 1996)
Based on that definition, you can draw many conclusions as to what is functional. Depending upon who you ask, you will most likely get a diverse variety of responses as to what is functional. All hominian movement is a combination of varied functions. Human movement cannot take place without muscular function. According to the functional training "experts", functional training uses bands, balls, free-weights, and plyometric exercises in an attempt to condition the body in an un-stable environment. galore of the experts feel that performing exercises that imitative activities or special skills is the most effective way to train, heedless of ones goal.
What is the safest, most efficient and hard-hitting way to optimize human performance?
Factors Affecting hominian Performance
In order to maximize human performance, you must have a good understanding of what affects performance. The factors that play the superior role in performance are: Power (Strength and Speed), Agility (Flexibility/Mobility/Stability), Cardiovascular and Respiratory Conditioning, Sport Skill (Neuromuscular Coordination and Efficiency), and Genetic Potential.
Let’s take a look at all factor and determine which training methods are going to deliver optimal results. By optimal results, I mean the greatest amount of improvement, with the least amount of risk, and in the shortest amount of time.
Power
Power= Force x Distance
Time
Power can be increased three ways.
1. Increase Force (Strength)
What is the most effective method of increasing strength and/or muscle tissue? In my opinion, High Intensity Strength Training is the most productive, safe, and time effective approach available. I am not stating that one ready of each exercise is the primo choice. My definition of High Intensity Training is: training to momentary athletic failure, with short and infrequent workouts in which complete variables are formal based on the individuals: goals, age, current fitness level, fiber types, own preference, and departed experience.
The purpose of strength training is to increase strength and wizened body mass, NOT for training a specific skill or movement-that's called practice! People strength train for many reasons and there are many methods that work. For years, many trainers and coaches have had their clients and athletes perform Olympic lifts because they feel it will transfer over into the performance of their skill. many studies have shown that the neurological transfer of skills is not best unless the skill is practiced EXACTLY as it is performed in competition. Therefore, performing power cleans because you play football is NOT optimal. Performing power-cleans will single get you healthier at performing power-cleans! Focus on incorporative strength and wizened body mass, and practice your skill exactly as it is performed during competition.
2. Increase Speed
Increasing the speed at which a skill is performed is another big way to improve power. Speed is primarily predetermined by the individual's heritable make up. However, that does not mean that you cannot improve speed by practicing the skill EXACTLY as it is performed in competition. A great deal of focus should be placed on perfecting the technique. By practicing the skill in this manner, you will improve neuromuscular efficiency, which will result in faster and much accurate performance.
3. Increase Distance (flexibility/range of motion)
Increasing flexibility is another way to improve power. By increasing flexibility, you increase the distance that force is applied which results in an increase in power.
The safest and most hard-hitting method to increase flexibility is by performing full range of motion exercises and incorporating a sound stretching routine.
Agility
Improving ones agility is another way of optimizing performance. Agility drills should be SPECIFIC to the activity or event. For example, having someone do Plyometric jumps disconnected of boxes is NOT specific to someone who plays basketball! Yes, a basketball player jumps, but not disconnected of boxes. Having the athlete practice jumping from the floor would be much more special to their sport. Always ask yourself, “What is the goal?” “Is what I’m doing active to give me the outcome I desire?” “Is it optimal?”
Cardiovascular and Respiratory Conditioning
Increasing cardio/respiratory output and endurance is another factor that has a starring impact on performance. This topic is one of much importance that it is beyond the scope of this article. In general, if you increase the individual's cardiovascular and respiratory output and endurance, there will be a corresponding increase in performance. Cardiovascular training should also be specifically geared towards improving the individuals conditioning in the metabolic pathway in which they compete or perform. For example, someone who plays tennis should primarily train at a slow to moderate pace and incorporate bursts of high intensity effort. Interval training would be a good choice for this individual. Keep the training specific to the individual.
Sport Skill
This is an area in which there is a lot of confusion among many athletes, coaches, and trainers. Skill acquisition and strength levels are two completely diametric things. Therefore, they should be drilled separately, and with different methods. In order to optimize the performance of a specific skill or movement, it needs to be practiced EXACTLY as it is performed in competition. It has been shown that each activity or movement has it's own neuromuscular pathway, and that just because a movement is related does NOT nasty there will be a positive transfer or carryover of skill. In order to maximize performance the individual should attempt to flawless their movement or skill with long hours of practice. The goal of practice should be to improve the technique, accuracy, and increase the speed at which the skill can be performed. This topic was addressed early in the section titled “Increase Force.”
Genetic latent
This is the factor that I have saved to have the greatest impact on human performance. heritable potential is something many people overlook. Regardless of what methods of training I use, I will never be a world-class marathoner. I can train twice a week or I can train 5 hours a day, it still won't change the fact that my body wasn't designed to excel at endurance activities. I hear of too many coaches and trainers having people follow mordacious training programs in an attempt to drastically improve their performance. This is not to say that you cannot improve performance. When training yourself or a competitive athlete, always set earthy goals. As explicit earlier, the primo thing to do is utilize the most effective methods available and work hard!
Differences between Functional Training and Machine supported Training
Most, if not complete of the questionable functional exercises, fail to supply continual and variable resistance. Most quality machines supply constant tension and variable resistance based on the strength curve of the particular muscle, and track prissy joint function.
For example, compare dumbbell bicep curls on a Swiss ball to a bicep curl on a quality machine (such as Hammer Strength.) While performing the dumbbell curl, there is no tension on the biceps in the bottom or best positions. The resistance is greatest when the dumbbell is perpendicular to the floor. The amount of stimulus is also decreased repayable to the fact that the separate must balance his/her self on the ball. While using a machine, there is constant tension on the biceps and the amount of tension varies during the exercise based on the strength curve of the biceps muscle. Which is active to make the individual stronger? Which is going to stimulate more muscle fibers in the biceps?
In my opinion, machine based training is by far greatest if the goal is to increase strength, and/or muscle tissue. Keep in mind that much muscle equates to a faster, stronger, and better athlete, providing they practice their specific skill or movement.
This is not to say that functional exercises serve no purpose. There are benefits to functional exercise; retributory not as galore as some people are lead to believe. Exercise selection and the training methods used should be based on the individual's goals. Instances where serviceable training may be effective would be in individuals who need to improve balance, stability, and neuromuscular coordination. Below is a chart that shows the differences between serviceable Training and Machine Based Training.
Machine-Based Training
Functional Training
Provides continual and variable resistance
Movement tracks proper joint function
Effectively overloads musculature (if used properly)
Safer to perform
Many machines acquirable to work all muscle in the body
Very effective at rising balance, stability, and coordination
Does NOT effectively overload musculature
Does NOT provide optimal transfer of skill performance
Very difficult to measure and monitor progress
Higher unplanned of injury
Conclusion
Functional training obviously has whatsoever benefit, and can be a big addition to a well-designed strength program. However, I personally feel it should never take the place of a structured strength training routine. I recommend using a combination approach, which utilizes machines, free-weights, bodyweight, balls, bands, and anything that is going to deliver the desired results. Always remember that training for strength and/or increases in muscle tissue and training for skill are two completely different things. When designing or assessing a training program the following questions should be asked. What is the goal? Is it time efficient? Is it safe? Is it delivering the desired results? Is it optimal?
References
- Schmidt, R. A : Motor Learning and Performance -From Principles to Practice. Human Kinetics Books; Champaign , IL 1991
- Bryzcki, Matt : A Practical Approach to Strength Training, Masters Press; Indianapolis , IN 1995
- Magil, R : Motor Learning -Concepts and Application, ordinal Edition, C. chromatic Publishing, Madison , Wisconsin 1993
- Chek, Paul : What is serviceable Exercise? (Article), C.H.E.K Institute
- Calais-Germaine, Blandine : Anatomy of Movement, Easterland Press, Seattle , WA 1993
- Tortora, Gerard, J : Principles of Human Anatomy, ordinal Edition, Harper Collins Publishers, New York , NY 1989
- Stein, Alan : Improving active Power (Article), woody Training Newsletter
- Manny, Ken : Skill Development : An Open and Closed Case (Article) www.naturalstrength.com
- Kielbaso, Jim : Plyos - My Story (Article) www.cyberpump.com
About The Author
Recent comments
17 hours 41 min ago
19 hours 51 min ago
1 day 6 hours ago
3 days 15 hours ago
3 days 17 hours ago
3 days 19 hours ago
4 days 14 hours ago
4 days 15 hours ago
5 days 10 hours ago
5 days 12 hours ago